Triple
T10799757
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illinois Court of Claims |
E254806
|
entity |
| Predicate | cannotAward |
P27970
|
FINISHED |
| Object | injunctive relief |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: injunctive relief | Statement: [Illinois Court of Claims, cannotAward, injunctive relief]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cannotAward Context triple: [Illinois Court of Claims, cannotAward, injunctive relief]
-
A.
cannotBeAwardedTo
Indicates that a particular entity is ineligible to receive a specified award, prize, or recognition.
-
B.
canAward
Indicates that one entity has the authority or ability to grant an award, honor, or recognition to another entity.
-
C.
notAwardedWhen
Indicates that one entity is not granted, conferred, or given in the circumstances or conditions specified by another entity or event.
-
D.
notAwardedFor
Indicates that a particular award, prize, or honor was explicitly not given in recognition of a specified work, achievement, or entity.
-
E.
cannotGrant
chosen
Indicates that an entity lacks the authority, permission, or ability to confer a requested right, access, or resource to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa61c15c8190a1839550c56e75e1 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d733366c408190bfd3b57be5ef2440 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f3188f00819094ee8d65b187a333 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:18 p.m.