Triple

T10790024
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ñuble River E254553 entity
Predicate hasOfficialLanguageOfSurroundingCountry P95491 FINISHED
Object Spanish LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish | Statement: [Ñuble River, hasOfficialLanguageOfSurroundingCountry, Spanish]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOfficialLanguageOfSurroundingCountry
Context triple: [Ñuble River, hasOfficialLanguageOfSurroundingCountry, Spanish]
  • A. hasLanguageOfSurroundingCountries
    Indicates that an entity uses or includes the languages commonly spoken in the countries that geographically surround it.
  • B. hasNotableLanguageWithOfficialStatusIn
    Indicates that a language holds an officially recognized and notable status within a specified jurisdiction or region.
  • C. isLinguaFrancaOf
    Indicates that a language serves as a common medium of communication between speakers of different native languages within a particular region, community, or context.
  • D. isUNOfficialLanguage
    Indicates that a language holds official status within the United Nations.
  • E. shareOfficialLanguage
    Indicates that two entities have at least one official language in common.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa609f008190a294200aefcb7bd5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d732f5b8248190a633dc44ae620a3a completed April 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6f316940c819092a96c429629fdef completed April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d6fa334b8c819082eaf8537084c323 completed April 9, 2026, 1 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:17 p.m.