Triple
T10787054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Port of Guayaquil |
E254477
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAccessChannelType |
P6865
|
FINISHED |
| Object | riverine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: riverine | Statement: [Port of Guayaquil, hasAccessChannelType, riverine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAccessChannelType Context triple: [Port of Guayaquil, hasAccessChannelType, riverine]
-
A.
hasChannel
Indicates that one entity possesses, provides, or is associated with a particular communication or distribution channel.
-
B.
hasAccessMode
chosen
Indicates the type or method of access that one entity is permitted to use with respect to another entity or resource.
-
C.
hasAccessMethod
Indicates that one entity uses or is associated with a particular method or mechanism for accessing another entity or resource.
-
D.
hasAccessTo
Indicates that one entity is permitted to enter, use, or interact with another entity, resource, or location.
-
E.
hasAccessTier
Indicates that one entity is assigned or associated with a specific level or tier of access permissions to another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa609f008190a294200aefcb7bd5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d732d5422481908d7ab833c6cbc879 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f316940c819092a96c429629fdef |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:17 p.m.