Triple

T1078588
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Working Groups of CELAC E23894 entity
Predicate hasThematicFocus P6627 FINISHED
Object social development LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: social development | Statement: [Working Groups of CELAC, hasThematicFocus, social development]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasThematicFocus
Context triple: [Working Groups of CELAC, hasThematicFocus, social development]
  • A. hasCentralTheme chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or dominant theme or subject matter of another entity.
  • B. notableTheme
    Indicates that a particular theme is prominently featured in, or strongly associated with, an entity such as a work, event, or body of content.
  • C. hasEditorialFocus
    Indicates that an entity (such as a publication or section) is primarily concerned with or oriented around a particular editorial topic, theme, or subject area.
  • D. hasArtisticFocus
    Indicates that an entity’s primary artistic attention, theme, or specialization is directed toward a particular subject, style, or medium.
  • E. followsInTheme
    Indicates that one element continues or succeeds another while maintaining the same theme or thematic context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4b943b41481909b24050ca7e78971 completed March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b73d9f08819093668104f129840e completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.