Triple
T10775858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wadai |
E254194
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedLanguageType |
P18209
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nilo-Saharan languages |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nilo-Saharan languages | Statement: [Wadai, usedLanguageType, Nilo-Saharan languages]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedLanguageType Context triple: [Wadai, usedLanguageType, Nilo-Saharan languages]
-
A.
languageUsedAs
Indicates that one language is employed in a specific role, function, or context relative to another entity or situation.
-
B.
languagesUsed
Indicates that one entity uses, employs, or is expressed in one or more languages associated with the other entity.
-
C.
languageUse
chosen
Indicates the language or languages an entity uses for communication, expression, or interaction.
-
D.
adoptedLanguage
Indicates that an entity has chosen and begun using a particular language, typically as its official, primary, or preferred means of communication.
-
E.
usedInLanguage
Indicates that something (such as a word, expression, or symbol) is employed or occurs within a particular language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa609f008190a294200aefcb7bd5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7329cc6c881908f827edff941d456 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 5:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f31455648190b5c24690487b1b54 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:16 p.m.