Triple
T1077165
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NAT64 |
E23865
|
entity |
| Predicate | enablesCommunicationWith |
P23643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IPv4 servers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IPv4 servers | Statement: [NAT64, enablesCommunicationWith, IPv4 servers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enablesCommunicationWith Context triple: [NAT64, enablesCommunicationWith, IPv4 servers]
-
A.
communicationMode
Indicates the method or channel through which communication between entities is carried out.
-
B.
canLiaiseWith
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to communicate and coordinate directly with another entity for collaboration or information exchange.
-
C.
communicationChannel
Indicates a medium or method through which information is transmitted between parties.
-
D.
usesSignaling
Indicates that one entity communicates or coordinates with another by emitting, transmitting, or interpreting signals.
-
E.
communicationStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of a communication process or exchange between entities (e.g., pending, active, failed, completed).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b94288d88190aae4fb86236c0702 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b73ba8208190be7f3cef8c18689b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4b80f0fb08190a19a50e38ae8f16c |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:05 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.