Triple
T1077105
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPsec |
E23863
|
entity |
| Predicate | canOperateThrough |
P11437
|
FINISHED |
| Object | NAT (with NAT traversal) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NAT (with NAT traversal) | Statement: [IPsec, canOperateThrough, NAT (with NAT traversal)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canOperateThrough Context triple: [IPsec, canOperateThrough, NAT (with NAT traversal)]
-
A.
canOperateUnder
Indicates that one entity is permitted, able, or qualified to function, perform, or remain active within the conditions, authority, or environment defined by another entity.
-
B.
canOperateInMultiple
Indicates that an entity is capable of functioning or being used across more than one context, environment, or mode.
-
C.
canPass
chosen
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
-
D.
operatesOver
Indicates that one entity performs actions or exerts functional control across, upon, or throughout another entity or domain.
-
E.
canUse
Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f1ddf48190a99d54b00e99f8ce |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b94288d88190aae4fb86236c0702 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b73ba8208190be7f3cef8c18689b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.