Triple

T10768347
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bob Hepple E254010 entity
Predicate wasDetainedFor P33388 FINISHED
Object anti-apartheid activities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anti-apartheid activities | Statement: [Bob Hepple, wasDetainedFor, anti-apartheid activities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasDetainedFor
Context triple: [Bob Hepple, wasDetainedFor, anti-apartheid activities]
  • A. wasDetainedDuring
    Indicates that an entity was held in custody or confinement for some period of time during a specified event or time interval.
  • B. detainedFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity is being held in custody or confinement because of, or as a consequence of, another entity (such as a reason, charge, or event).
  • C. detainedAfter
    Indicates that one entity is held in custody or confinement following another specified event or action.
  • D. detainedBy
    Indicates that an entity is being held in custody or confinement by another entity, typically an authority or controlling party.
  • E. usedToDetain
    Indicates that something serves or functioned as a means, tool, or facility for holding or confining someone against their will.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5f54f4819082d0bbcb6f8797e6 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d7322f9968819098b0ad54b913bfe4 completed April 9, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6f311529c819080ca5493d55d6050 completed April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:16 p.m.