Triple
T10764184
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate articles |
E253909
|
entity |
| Predicate | argumentFocus |
P95864
|
FINISHED |
| Object | portability of operating systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: portability of operating systems | Statement: [Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate articles, argumentFocus, portability of operating systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: argumentFocus Context triple: [Tanenbaum–Torvalds debate articles, argumentFocus, portability of operating systems]
-
A.
focusOf
Indicates that one entity is the primary subject, target, or center of attention, activity, or interest for another entity.
-
B.
focusType
Indicates the specific kind or category of focus or attention that is being applied to or associated with an entity or interaction.
-
C.
focusPosition
Indicates the spatial or logical position at which attention, concentration, or processing is currently directed within a given context.
-
D.
focusesOn
Indicates that one entity directs its attention, effort, or primary activity toward another entity or specific subject.
-
E.
formerFocus
Indicates that an entity previously served as the primary focus or main subject of attention, but no longer holds that status.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5f54f4819082d0bbcb6f8797e6 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d731a504948190943f0e27c0d891ed |
completed | April 9, 2026, 4:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f311529c819080ca5493d55d6050 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d6fa323564819097b207eb53f8a9b8 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:16 p.m.