Triple
T10736124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cantigas de Santa Maria |
E253199
|
entity |
| Predicate | notatedIn |
P5301
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mensural notation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mensural notation | Statement: [Cantigas de Santa Maria, notatedIn, mensural notation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notatedIn Context triple: [Cantigas de Santa Maria, notatedIn, mensural notation]
-
A.
annotatedBy
Indicates that one entity has been marked up, commented on, or otherwise supplied with annotations by another entity.
-
B.
commentatedFor
Indicates that one entity provided live or recorded commentary or analysis for an event, performance, or broadcast on behalf of another entity (such as an organization, channel, or client).
-
C.
isNotedOn
Indicates that information about one entity is recorded, mentioned, or annotated on another entity (such as a document, record, or medium).
-
D.
notedIn
chosen
Indicates that information about one entity is mentioned, recorded, or referenced within another entity, such as a document, record, or source.
-
E.
namedIn
Indicates that one entity is explicitly mentioned or referenced by name within another entity (such as a document, statement, or record).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5e51e8819095f06881cecf152e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d71022aee0819091a5790d3dee6777 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6f309a44881908e49e3ba478c35b4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:14 p.m.