Triple
T10732899
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GAGA (Géométrie Algébrique et Géométrie Analytique) |
E253117
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry
Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry are foundational techniques that use sheaf cohomology to relate and study algebraic and analytic geometry, profoundly influencing modern algebraic geometry and complex geometry.
|
E883481
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry | Statement: [GAGA (Géométrie Algébrique et Géométrie Analytique), associatedWith, Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry Context triple: [GAGA (Géométrie Algébrique et Géométrie Analytique), associatedWith, Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry]
-
A.
Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles
The Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles are a set of deep, still unproven hypotheses in algebraic geometry that aim to provide a foundational theory of algebraic cycles and their cohomological properties, underpinning much of the modern theory of motives.
-
B.
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry is a foundational mathematical monograph by Friedrich Hirzebruch that applies topological techniques, particularly characteristic classes and cobordism theory, to problems in algebraic geometry.
-
C.
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry is a fundamental result stating that the image of a morphism of finite type between schemes (or varieties) is a constructible set, playing a key role in understanding how geometric properties behave under mappings.
-
D.
Éléments de géométrie algébrique
Éléments de géométrie algébrique is a foundational multi-volume treatise that reshaped modern algebraic geometry by developing the theory of schemes and cohomology in a highly general, abstract framework.
-
E.
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework is a foundational reformulation of algebraic geometry that generalizes varieties using schemes, enabling powerful tools like sheaf theory, cohomology, and modern number-theoretic applications.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry Triple: [GAGA (Géométrie Algébrique et Géométrie Analytique), associatedWith, Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry]
Generated description
Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry are foundational techniques that use sheaf cohomology to relate and study algebraic and analytic geometry, profoundly influencing modern algebraic geometry and complex geometry.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry Target entity description: Serre’s cohomological methods in algebraic geometry are foundational techniques that use sheaf cohomology to relate and study algebraic and analytic geometry, profoundly influencing modern algebraic geometry and complex geometry.
-
A.
Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles
The Standard Conjectures on Algebraic Cycles are a set of deep, still unproven hypotheses in algebraic geometry that aim to provide a foundational theory of algebraic cycles and their cohomological properties, underpinning much of the modern theory of motives.
-
B.
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry
Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry is a foundational mathematical monograph by Friedrich Hirzebruch that applies topological techniques, particularly characteristic classes and cobordism theory, to problems in algebraic geometry.
-
C.
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry
Chevalley’s theorem in algebraic geometry is a fundamental result stating that the image of a morphism of finite type between schemes (or varieties) is a constructible set, playing a key role in understanding how geometric properties behave under mappings.
-
D.
Éléments de géométrie algébrique
Éléments de géométrie algébrique is a foundational multi-volume treatise that reshaped modern algebraic geometry by developing the theory of schemes and cohomology in a highly general, abstract framework.
-
E.
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework
Grothendieck’s scheme-theoretic framework is a foundational reformulation of algebraic geometry that generalizes varieties using schemes, enabling powerful tools like sheaf theory, cohomology, and modern number-theoretic applications.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5d8be481909a43218b2bfdbe95 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d7101ff9808190a27fcc06da097ea3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:34 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69de22bb62e481909544c87801012df3 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:19 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69de271ca4f081908d78a20b25ebd25c |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:38 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69de2ccee0cc8190acd24d5c225f7cde |
completed | April 14, 2026, 12:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:14 p.m.