Triple
T10716362
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Back to Basics Tour |
E252682
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresSong |
P2152
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Still Dirrty |
E51462
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Still Dirrty | Statement: [Back to Basics Tour, featuresSong, Still Dirrty]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Still Dirrty Context triple: [Back to Basics Tour, featuresSong, Still Dirrty]
-
A.
Dirrty
chosen
"Dirrty" is a 2002 hit single by Christina Aguilera known for its edgy sound, provocative lyrics, and controversial music video that marked a bold shift in her public image.
-
B.
Keep It Playa
"Keep It Playa" is a smooth, laid-back hip-hop track by Pharrell featuring Slim Thug that appears on his debut solo album "In My Mind."
-
C.
Hit 'Em Up
"Hit 'Em Up" is a hip-hop track featured on DJ Khaled's album "We the Best."
-
D.
Hit 'Em Up
"Hit 'Em Up" is a notorious 1996 diss track by Tupac Shakur, widely regarded as one of the most aggressive and influential feud records in hip-hop history.
-
E.
Still D.R.E.
"Still D.R.E." is a landmark 1999 West Coast hip-hop single by Dr. Dre featuring Snoop Dogg, known for its iconic piano riff and role in Dre’s comeback.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5d8be481909a43218b2bfdbe95 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6ff3320448190899c56b02a7f5ffa |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:21 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d999278b8481909bc4e849b9580eb7 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:13 p.m.