Triple
T10699104
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federalist No. 80 |
E252222
|
entity |
| Predicate | writtenByPublius |
P13198
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Federalist No. 80, writtenByPublius, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: writtenByPublius Context triple: [Federalist No. 80, writtenByPublius, true]
-
A.
writtenIn
Indicates that a work (such as a text, program, or document) is expressed or encoded using a particular language or notation.
-
B.
founderWrote
Indicates that an entity who is a founder of something is also the author or writer of a specified work or text.
-
C.
foundedOnWritingsOf
Indicates that something (such as an idea, movement, or institution) is established or based upon the writings or written works of a particular source.
-
D.
probableAuthorOf
chosen
Indicates that an entity is likely, but not certainly, the author or creator of another entity.
-
E.
hasHistoricalWritingInfluenceFrom
Indicates that one entity’s historical writing style, content, or traditions are influenced by those of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5cbabc8190973e683950d89faf |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fd8abd7c81909c274aa1699a3695 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd8cc0788190b4c02a772e4b58b3 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:12 p.m.