Triple

T10697501
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Indication Géographique Protégée E252181 entity
Predicate introducedInLaw P8259 FINISHED
Object 1992 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1992 | Statement: [Indication Géographique Protégée, introducedInLaw, 1992]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedInLaw
Context triple: [Indication Géographique Protégée, introducedInLaw, 1992]
  • A. introducedInLaws
    Indicates that one entity caused another entity to meet or become acquainted with their in-laws.
  • B. introducedByLaw
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, measure, or change) came into effect or was established as a result of a specific law being enacted.
  • C. legislatedOn
    Indicates that a legislative body has formally considered, debated, or enacted laws or regulations concerning a particular subject or entity.
  • D. introducedFor
    Indicates that one entity was presented or brought to the attention of another entity for a specific purpose or role.
  • E. introducedDuring chosen
    Indicates that one entity was first brought into existence, use, or awareness within the time period, event, or context specified by the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5cbabc8190973e683950d89faf completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6fd89390c8190969ab2b4a79d5818 completed April 9, 2026, 1:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd8cc0788190b4c02a772e4b58b3 completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:12 p.m.