Triple
T1067667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | La Pérouse Strait |
E23248
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNavigationHazards |
P22896
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strong currents |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strong currents | Statement: [La Pérouse Strait, hasNavigationHazards, strong currents]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNavigationHazards Context triple: [La Pérouse Strait, hasNavigationHazards, strong currents]
-
A.
hasNavigationHazard
chosen
Indicates that something presents or contains a condition, object, or feature that poses a risk or obstacle to safe navigation.
-
B.
hasNavigationHazardRelevance
Indicates that something is relevant to, affected by, or poses a potential hazard to navigation.
-
C.
hasNotableHazard
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant risk, danger, or harmful condition that is noteworthy or exceptional.
-
D.
hasHazardSignage
Indicates that appropriate warning or hazard signs are present to alert people to potential dangers associated with the entity.
-
E.
hasNavigationAid
Indicates that one entity provides or is equipped with a navigation aid used to assist in determining position or direction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493ee1f908190992b5f0d1b04459b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b9e1047481909af1cf8df2a01fff |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b736f1e881909bace735b38c0ade |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.