Triple
T10673826
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Samuel Nelson |
E251561
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableCase |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Prize Cases (dissented) |
E251553
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Prize Cases (dissented) | Statement: [Samuel Nelson, notableCase, The Prize Cases (dissented)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Prize Cases (dissented) Context triple: [Samuel Nelson, notableCase, The Prize Cases (dissented)]
-
A.
The Prize Cases
The Prize Cases were a landmark 1863 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to blockade Confederate ports without a formal declaration of war, expanding the scope of executive war powers.
-
B.
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
chosen
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
-
C.
Learned Hand
Learned Hand was a highly influential American federal judge renowned for his incisive opinions on constitutional and tax law and his lasting impact on U.S. jurisprudence.
-
D.
Ex parte McCardle
Ex parte McCardle is an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case best known for affirming Congress’s power to limit the Court’s appellate jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution.
-
E.
Insular Cases
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fb9299708190a0a3818f2e4e9bf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69dbacf1a43c8190869f4a64f9d6a26c |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.