Triple

T10673693
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Taney Court E251558 entity
Predicate hasIdeologicalTendency P31611 FINISHED
Object states’ rights LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: states’ rights | Statement: [Taney Court, hasIdeologicalTendency, states’ rights]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIdeologicalTendency
Context triple: [Taney Court, hasIdeologicalTendency, states’ rights]
  • A. hasIdeologicalPosition chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds, endorses, or is associated with a particular ideological stance or viewpoint.
  • B. hasIdeologicalOrigin
    Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on a particular ideology.
  • C. politicalTendency
    Indicates the general political orientation, leaning, or ideological stance associated with an entity in relation to the political spectrum.
  • D. hasIdeologicalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds or fulfills a specific function, position, or influence within an ideology or ideological framework.
  • E. ideologicalInfluence
    Indicates that one entity’s beliefs, values, or doctrines shape, guide, or significantly affect the ideology of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6fb9299708190a0a3818f2e4e9bf5 completed April 9, 2026, 1:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd8a93208190a573061387e2aebb completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.