Triple
T10673542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Opinion in The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh (1851) |
E251555
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh |
E251555
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh | Statement: [Opinion in The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh (1851), caseName, The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh Context triple: [Opinion in The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh (1851), caseName, The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh]
-
A.
Opinion in The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh (1851)
chosen
The Opinion in The Genesee Chief v. Fitzhugh (1851) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal admiralty jurisdiction to include the Great Lakes and other inland navigable waters.
-
B.
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins is a landmark 1938 U.S. Supreme Court decision that ended the practice of federal general common law and required federal courts in diversity cases to apply state substantive law.
-
C.
McPherson v. Blacker
McPherson v. Blacker is an 1892 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state’s authority to determine how its presidential electors are chosen, affirming broad state control over the Electoral College selection process.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Ingraham v. Wright
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fb9299708190a0a3818f2e4e9bf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d9886e3f108190bb6f17d4e2f394ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.