Triple
T10673532
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) |
E251554
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalConclusion |
P95247
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Congress’s power over commerce is not necessarily exclusive in all areas |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Congress’s power over commerce is not necessarily exclusive in all areas | Statement: [Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852), legalConclusion, Congress’s power over commerce is not necessarily exclusive in all areas]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalConclusion Context triple: [Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852), legalConclusion, Congress’s power over commerce is not necessarily exclusive in all areas]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
C.
legalMatters
Indicates that one entity is involved with, concerned about, or responsible for legal issues, processes, or obligations related to another entity or context.
-
D.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
E.
legalContent
Indicates that the associated material complies with applicable laws and regulations and is permitted for use, distribution, or display.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6fb9299708190a0a3818f2e4e9bf5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd8a93208190a573061387e2aebb |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d6df47899481909ac0e518d94883cb |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.