Triple
T10673497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852) |
E251554
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | landmark Commerce Clause case |
C733
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: landmark Commerce Clause case Context triple: [Opinion in Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852), instanceOf, landmark Commerce Clause case]
-
A.
landmark case
chosen
A landmark case is a court decision that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
B.
landmark decision
A landmark decision is a court ruling that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
C.
Supreme Court footnote
A Supreme Court footnote is a subordinate textual annotation in a Court opinion that provides clarification, limitation, or additional reasoning that can significantly influence the interpretation and scope of the decision.
-
D.
constitutional law case
A constitutional law case is a legal dispute that requires a court to interpret and apply a nation's constitution to determine the validity of government actions, laws, or policies.
-
E.
United States Supreme Court case
A United States Supreme Court case is a legal dispute brought before the highest federal court in the U.S., resulting in a binding decision that interprets the Constitution, federal laws, or treaties and sets nationwide precedent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:09 p.m.