Triple
T10668497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Åna-Sira fjord |
E251420
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeRegion |
P285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Agder |
E120897
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Agder | Statement: [Åna-Sira fjord, administrativeRegion, Agder]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Agder Context triple: [Åna-Sira fjord, administrativeRegion, Agder]
-
A.
Agder
chosen
Agder is a county in southern Norway known for its long coastline, maritime heritage, and popular coastal towns and islands.
-
B.
Aust-Agder
Aust-Agder was a former county in southern Norway known for its coastal towns, forests, and role in the country’s maritime and timber industries.
-
C.
Buskerud
Buskerud is a former county in southeastern Norway known for its varied landscape of forests, rivers, and mountains, including parts of the Hallingdal valley and Hardangervidda plateau.
-
D.
Hordaland
Hordaland was a former county in western Norway known for its fjords, coastal landscapes, and the city of Bergen.
-
E.
Hedmarken
Hedmarken is a traditional district in Innlandet county in eastern Norway, known for its agricultural landscapes and its central town, Hamar.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5b0d2881909584b20efc5877f0 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6f860790c81909c2c1d3c489ec5b4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 12:52 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e5424a26688190a49c3920d0edb546 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:08 p.m.