Triple
T1066410
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York State Assembly districts |
E23219
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeChallengedIn |
P17875
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state courts |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state courts | Statement: [New York State Assembly districts, canBeChallengedIn, state courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeChallengedIn Context triple: [New York State Assembly districts, canBeChallengedIn, state courts]
-
A.
canBeChallengedOn
Indicates that one entity’s claim, decision, or status is open to being questioned, disputed, or formally contested by another entity.
-
B.
mayBeChallengedBy
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
-
C.
hasChallenge
Indicates that an entity faces, experiences, or is confronted with a particular difficulty, obstacle, or problem.
-
D.
stateActionChallenged
Indicates that an action taken by a state (or state authority) has been formally disputed, questioned, or contested by another party.
-
E.
canBeAppealedTo
chosen
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493ee1f908190992b5f0d1b04459b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4b9e1047481909af1cf8df2a01fff |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b736f1e881909bace735b38c0ade |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.