Triple

T10650211
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Los Eléctricos E250945 entity
Predicate hasAssociationType P781 FINISHED
Object sporting nickname LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sporting nickname | Statement: [Los Eléctricos, hasAssociationType, sporting nickname]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAssociationType
Context triple: [Los Eléctricos, hasAssociationType, sporting nickname]
  • A. hasPrimaryAssociation
    Indicates that one entity is chiefly or most directly connected, linked, or related to another among possible associations.
  • B. associatedWithAssociation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular association or organization.
  • C. hasAffiliationType chosen
    Indicates that one entity is connected to another through a specified kind or category of affiliation or association.
  • D. hasStereotypeAssociation
    Indicates that one entity is associated with another through a stereotype, implying a generalized or oversimplified characterization rather than an individually grounded attribute.
  • E. haveType
    Indicates that an entity belongs to or is classified under a specified type or category.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5a4c4881908f39be6efe5981e5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6dfe4b97081908815b77612222318 completed April 8, 2026, 11:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd83b114819098e84dc658e82d7e completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:06 p.m.