Triple

T10649292
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kar Kraft E250919 entity
Predicate roleInBoss429Program P11687 FINISHED
Object design LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: design | Statement: [Kar Kraft, roleInBoss429Program, design]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: roleInBoss429Program
Context triple: [Kar Kraft, roleInBoss429Program, design]
  • A. servesRole chosen
    Indicates that one entity performs, fulfills, or occupies a particular function, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • B. hasBoss
    Indicates that one entity serves as the direct superior or manager of another entity in a hierarchical relationship.
  • C. qualifyingRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a role, position, or function that qualifies or entitles it (or another entity) to participate in a specified activity, status, or relationship.
  • D. roleInBun
    Indicates that an entity has a specific functional or contextual role within a particular bundle, grouping, or composite structure.
  • E. roleInCommandStructure
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific position or function within the hierarchical command structure of another entity or organization.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5a4c4881908f39be6efe5981e5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6dfe3ea08819094a945ebb7fc4d3a completed April 8, 2026, 11:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd83b114819098e84dc658e82d7e completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:06 p.m.