Triple

T10642252
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Julie d’Étanges E250750 entity
Predicate influencedReceptionOfWork P22974 FINISHED
Object sentimental literature LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sentimental literature | Statement: [Julie d’Étanges, influencedReceptionOfWork, sentimental literature]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: influencedReceptionOfWork
Context triple: [Julie d’Étanges, influencedReceptionOfWork, sentimental literature]
  • A. influencedWork
    Indicates that one work has had a significant impact on the creation, style, content, or development of another work.
  • B. wereInfluencedBy
    Indicates that one entity’s ideas, actions, or characteristics were shaped or affected by another entity.
  • C. influencedPerceptionOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or altered how another entity is perceived or understood.
  • D. placeOfInfluence
    Indicates the location or area where an entity exerts significant impact, authority, or cultural, social, or intellectual influence.
  • E. influencedScholar
    Indicates that one scholar has had a significant intellectual or academic impact on another scholar’s work, ideas, or development.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5a4c4881908f39be6efe5981e5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6dfce1ddc8190893fe6f7b047b56b completed April 8, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd83b114819098e84dc658e82d7e completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:05 p.m.