Triple

T10642246
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Julie d’Étanges E250750 entity
Predicate relationshipToBaron de Wolmar P95129 FINISHED
Object wife in the narrative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wife in the narrative | Statement: [Julie d’Étanges, relationshipToBaron de Wolmar, wife in the narrative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToBaron de Wolmar
Context triple: [Julie d’Étanges, relationshipToBaron de Wolmar, wife in the narrative]
  • A. relationshipToGustav von Aschenbach
    Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or emotional connection an entity has to Gustav von Aschenbach.
  • B. relationshipToManfred
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that one entity has to the individual named Manfred.
  • C. relationshipToThorismund
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Thorismund.
  • D. associatedNobleFamily
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular noble family, typically by heritage, allegiance, or formal association.
  • E. relationshipWithMiladyDeWinter
    Indicates a personal or interpersonal connection that an entity has with Milady de Winter, such as familial, romantic, adversarial, or other significant relational ties.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5a4c4881908f39be6efe5981e5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6dfce1ddc8190893fe6f7b047b56b completed April 8, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd83b114819098e84dc658e82d7e completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d6df463ea8819091d6683e476b4f21 completed April 8, 2026, 11:05 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:05 p.m.