Triple
T10637715
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NYRB II |
E250635
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesPlayerPathway |
P18155
|
FINISHED |
| Object | academy-to-first-team pathway |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: academy-to-first-team pathway | Statement: [NYRB II, usesPlayerPathway, academy-to-first-team pathway]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesPlayerPathway Context triple: [NYRB II, usesPlayerPathway, academy-to-first-team pathway]
-
A.
hasPlayerPathway
chosen
Indicates that there is a defined developmental or progression route available for a player within a given context or system.
-
B.
player
Indicates that an entity participates in a game, sport, or activity in the role of a player.
-
C.
hasPlayer
Indicates that an entity (such as a team, game, or roster) includes or is associated with a specific player.
-
D.
developedPlayer
Indicates that one entity (such as a coach, club, or organization) was responsible for training, nurturing, or improving the skills and abilities of a player entity.
-
E.
supportsPlayers
Indicates that an entity provides compatibility or functionality for one or more players to participate or be used.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6dfae51148190840a4e52b29ad06e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd83b114819098e84dc658e82d7e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:04 p.m.