Triple

T10632403
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Robert Kincaid E250489 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson P95082 FINISHED
Object brief love affair LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: brief love affair | Statement: [Robert Kincaid, relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson, brief love affair]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson
Context triple: [Robert Kincaid, relationshipTypeWith Francesca Johnson, brief love affair]
  • A. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • B. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • C. hasFamilialTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are connected by family bonds, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • D. playerRelations
    Indicates the nature or status of the relationship between players, such as alliances, rivalries, or other interpersonal dynamics.
  • E. relationshipStatusWithMichael
    Indicates the type or state of the relationship that an entity currently has with Michael.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df95f5e88190b34ce3ec972759ef completed April 8, 2026, 11:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd7fae088190973f70c69738af49 completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d6df463ea8819091d6683e476b4f21 completed April 8, 2026, 11:05 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:02 p.m.