Triple
T10631622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Saginaw Bay |
E250469
|
entity |
| Predicate | receivesRiver |
P4359
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cass River |
E350254
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cass River | Statement: [Saginaw Bay, receivesRiver, Cass River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cass River Context triple: [Saginaw Bay, receivesRiver, Cass River]
-
A.
Cass River
chosen
Cass River is a significant river in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula that flows through Saginaw County and contributes to the Saginaw River watershed.
-
B.
Cass River
Cass River is a river in New Zealand’s South Island that drains alpine catchments in the Mackenzie Basin before flowing into the glacial Lake Tekapo.
-
C.
Rouge River
Rouge River is a river in southeastern Michigan that flows through the Detroit metropolitan area and is known for its industrial history and ongoing environmental restoration efforts.
-
D.
Rouge River
Rouge River is a significant river in the Greater Toronto Area known for flowing through urban and natural landscapes, including parks and conservation areas.
-
E.
Mackinaw River
The Mackinaw River is a central Illinois waterway known for its relatively undisturbed natural habitats, recreational opportunities, and contribution to the Illinois River watershed.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6df94dc1c8190b6347eaf35a5acc2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e4acb7fdac8190bced7e26c948ee4a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 10:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:01 p.m.