Triple

T10625499
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject False Claims Act E250310 entity
Predicate whistleblowerTerm P95047 FINISHED
Object relator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relator | Statement: [False Claims Act, whistleblowerTerm, relator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: whistleblowerTerm
Context triple: [False Claims Act, whistleblowerTerm, relator]
  • A. notableWhistleblower
    Indicates that the subject is recognized for having exposed significant wrongdoing or misconduct, typically within an organization or institution.
  • B. usedSecretPolice
    Indicates that an entity employed or relied on secret police forces to monitor, control, or repress others.
  • C. conspirator
    Indicates that an entity participates with others in planning or carrying out a secret or illicit scheme or action.
  • D. employerSanctionsDescription
    Indicates a description of penalties or disciplinary actions imposed by an employer in response to certain behaviors, violations, or conditions.
  • E. threatensToReveal
    Indicates a situation where one entity warns or intends to disclose information about another entity, typically to exert pressure or gain leverage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df80a30c81909f36fe221cf68822 completed April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd7fae088190973f70c69738af49 completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d6df463ea8819091d6683e476b4f21 completed April 8, 2026, 11:05 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 8:54 p.m.