Triple
T10623875
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Independent Submission Stream |
E250271
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayBeReviewedFor |
P8869
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conflict with IETF standards |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conflict with IETF standards | Statement: [Independent Submission Stream, mayBeReviewedFor, conflict with IETF standards]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeReviewedFor Context triple: [Independent Submission Stream, mayBeReviewedFor, conflict with IETF standards]
-
A.
areReviewedEvery
Indicates that one entity conducts reviews of another entity at every specified time interval or on every relevant occasion.
-
B.
reviewedBy
Indicates that an item, work, or action has been examined and evaluated by a specific agent or reviewer.
-
C.
hasReviewPeriod
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
-
D.
canReview
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the permission or ability to evaluate, assess, or provide feedback on another entity.
-
E.
hasReviewReception
Indicates that an entity has received a critical or evaluative review describing how it was received or perceived.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6df7f11fc8190aed858f2e1443c08 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd7fae088190973f70c69738af49 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 8:52 p.m.