Triple

T10623770
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC Series Working Group E250268 entity
Predicate conductsWork P1554 FINISHED
Object via IETF mailing lists LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: via IETF mailing lists | Statement: [RFC Series Working Group, conductsWork, via IETF mailing lists]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conductsWork
Context triple: [RFC Series Working Group, conductsWork, via IETF mailing lists]
  • A. workFor
    Indicates that one entity is employed by or performs work under the authority or direction of another entity.
  • B. worksTo
    Indicates that one entity performs work or exerts effort in order to achieve, support, or contribute to another entity or outcome.
  • C. performsWorkOf
    Indicates that one entity carries out, executes, or fulfills the tasks, functions, or role that are normally associated with another entity.
  • D. conducts chosen
    Indicates that an entity organizes, directs, or carries out an activity, operation, or process involving another entity.
  • E. ownsWork
    Indicates that one entity has legal ownership or proprietary rights over a particular work or creation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df7f11fc8190aed858f2e1443c08 completed April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd7fae088190973f70c69738af49 completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 8:52 p.m.