Triple

T10623754
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC Series Working Group E250268 entity
Predicate hasStakeholder P1553 FINISHED
Object RFC Publisher E35272 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC Publisher | Statement: [RFC Series Working Group, hasStakeholder, RFC Publisher]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC Publisher
Context triple: [RFC Series Working Group, hasStakeholder, RFC Publisher]
  • A. RFC Editor chosen
    The RFC Editor is the organization responsible for editing, publishing, and maintaining the Request for Comments (RFC) series that documents standards and technical notes for the Internet community.
  • B. RFC
    RFC is the commonly used abbreviation for Reading Football Club, a professional English football team based in Reading, Berkshire.
  • C. RFC
    RFC is the common abbreviation for Rangers Football Club, a professional football team based in Glasgow, Scotland.
  • D. RFC
    RFC is the common abbreviation for the Richmond Football Club, a professional Australian rules football team based in Melbourne that competes in the Australian Football League (AFL).
  • E. RFCs
    RFCs (Requests for Comments) are a series of technical and organizational documents that define and standardize protocols, procedures, and policies for the Internet and related networks.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df7f11fc8190aed858f2e1443c08 completed April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69d96b9a27f881908e451bfa6c118af4 completed April 10, 2026, 9:28 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 8:52 p.m.