Triple
T1062056
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Escharen |
E22927
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFormerAdministrativeStatus |
P14579
|
FINISHED |
| Object | independent municipality |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: independent municipality | Statement: [Escharen, hasFormerAdministrativeStatus, independent municipality]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFormerAdministrativeStatus Context triple: [Escharen, hasFormerAdministrativeStatus, independent municipality]
-
A.
formerAdministrativeStatus
chosen
Indicates that an entity previously held, but no longer holds, a particular administrative status or role.
-
B.
formerAdministeredBy
Indicates that an entity was previously administered or managed by another entity, but is no longer under that administration.
-
C.
hadSpecialStatusIn
Indicates that an entity possessed a particular special, exceptional, or non-standard status within a specified context or time period.
-
D.
historicalRecordStatus
Indicates the status or condition of a record within a historical or archival context (e.g., active, archived, revised, or obsolete).
-
E.
hasMunicipalStatusChange
Indicates that an entity undergoes a change in its official municipal status (e.g., creation, upgrade, downgrade, merger, or dissolution as a municipality).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493dada0481909c43649f9843ea91 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ba6e35ac8190802341c31bda0e3b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7340a048190807363f19d17a58f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.