Triple

T10620440
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Peucini E250182 entity
Predicate ethnoCulturalDebate P70164 FINISHED
Object Germanic affiliation hypothesis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Germanic affiliation hypothesis | Statement: [Peucini, ethnoCulturalDebate, Germanic affiliation hypothesis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnoCulturalDebate
Context triple: [Peucini, ethnoCulturalDebate, Germanic affiliation hypothesis]
  • A. culturalIssue
    Indicates that something pertains to, arises from, or significantly affects the beliefs, values, practices, or norms of a particular culture or group.
  • B. hasSubcultureDebate
    Indicates that there is an ongoing or notable debate, disagreement, or contested discourse within or about a particular subculture.
  • C. hasEthnoReligiousDimension chosen
    Indicates that the relationship, event, or phenomenon involves or is characterized by an ethnic and/or religious aspect or component.
  • D. sharesEthnicity
    Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
  • E. heritageDebate
    Indicates a discussion or dispute concerning the preservation, interpretation, or value of cultural or historical heritage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aa5993448190a493b790b8f85010 completed April 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df6fc47c8190b77b61a7fd223d65 completed April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd7a223c8190854409d76368f3e8 completed April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 8:46 p.m.