Triple
T10613440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kirpan |
E276060
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDebate |
P57644
|
FINISHED |
| Object | religious freedom vs public safety |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: religious freedom vs public safety | Statement: [Kirpan, legalDebate, religious freedom vs public safety]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDebate Context triple: [Kirpan, legalDebate, religious freedom vs public safety]
-
A.
legalAndEthicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where an issue, action, or decision is the subject of ongoing discussion and disagreement concerning both its legality and its ethical acceptability.
-
B.
fieldOfDebate
chosen
Indicates that something is the subject or domain around which a debate or argumentative discussion is centered.
-
C.
legalStatusDebatedBy
Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the subject of dispute, discussion, or controversy among parties or authorities.
-
D.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
E.
constitutionalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, disputing, or interpreting the meaning, scope, or application of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaf948d88190806cc3a8c47a3fb2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6df5ca94c8190aa3771925913defc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd7a223c8190854409d76368f3e8 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.