Triple
T1061264
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Bird in a Cage |
E22911
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTitleMetaphor |
P4929
|
FINISHED |
| Object | a caged bird representing constrained lovers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: a caged bird representing constrained lovers | Statement: [The Bird in a Cage, hasTitleMetaphor, a caged bird representing constrained lovers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTitleMetaphor Context triple: [The Bird in a Cage, hasTitleMetaphor, a caged bird representing constrained lovers]
-
A.
usesTitle
Indicates that one entity refers to or addresses another entity using a specific title or formal designation.
-
B.
containsTitle
Indicates that one entity includes or holds another entity’s title as part of its content or metadata.
-
C.
primaryMetaphor
Indicates a fundamental conceptual mapping where one domain (often concrete or physical) is systematically understood in terms of another (often abstract), forming a basic metaphorical relationship between them.
-
D.
hadTitle
Indicates that an entity held or was assigned a specific title or formal designation.
-
E.
titleAlludesTo
chosen
Indicates that one title makes an indirect or suggestive reference to the content, theme, or another work associated with the other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493dada0481909c43649f9843ea91 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4ba6e35ac8190802341c31bda0e3b |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4b7340a048190807363f19d17a58f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.