Triple
T10612291
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mughal Subah of Allahabad |
E276033
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadJudicialSystem |
P10526
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mughal imperial law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mughal imperial law | Statement: [Mughal Subah of Allahabad, hadJudicialSystem, Mughal imperial law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadJudicialSystem Context triple: [Mughal Subah of Allahabad, hadJudicialSystem, Mughal imperial law]
-
A.
hadJudicialCounterpart
Indicates that one legal or judicial entity corresponded to, or was matched by, another entity serving an equivalent judicial role or function.
-
B.
hadJudicialFunction
Indicates that an entity exercised or was assigned an official judicial role, authority, or responsibility in relation to another entity or context.
-
C.
hasJudiciary
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, is served by, or is under the authority of a judicial body or legal court system.
-
D.
judicialArticle
Indicates that there is a specific legal or judicial article that governs, defines, or is applied to the relationship or action between the entities.
-
E.
judicialBody
Indicates that an entity serves as a court or tribunal with authority to adjudicate legal disputes or interpret and apply the law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaf948d88190806cc3a8c47a3fb2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d6df5baf94819097b14a73af058f35 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 11:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d6dd7a223c8190854409d76368f3e8 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 10:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.