Triple

T10606519
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Collegiate Circuit Courts E275888 entity
Predicate mayResolve P9755 FINISHED
Object competence conflicts between lower federal courts within the circuit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: competence conflicts between lower federal courts within the circuit | Statement: [Collegiate Circuit Courts, mayResolve, competence conflicts between lower federal courts within the circuit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayResolve
Context triple: [Collegiate Circuit Courts, mayResolve, competence conflicts between lower federal courts within the circuit]
  • A. mayReject
    Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
  • B. mayResultIn
    Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
  • C. mayHold
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
  • D. mayRequest
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to make a request to another entity or for a particular resource or action.
  • E. resolves chosen
    Indicates that one entity successfully finds a solution, answer, or outcome for a problem, conflict, or uncertainty involving another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aaf948d88190806cc3a8c47a3fb2 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d6df4b7aa48190bf7873b293571030 completed April 8, 2026, 11:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d6dd72c1288190adbb5e79e94c044a completed April 8, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 7:32 p.m.