Triple
T10593856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Milford, Massachusetts |
E250058
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHistoricProduct |
P14355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Milford pink granite |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Milford pink granite | Statement: [Milford, Massachusetts, hasHistoricProduct, Milford pink granite]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricProduct Context triple: [Milford, Massachusetts, hasHistoricProduct, Milford pink granite]
-
A.
keyHistoricalProduct
chosen
Indicates that the product played a significant or defining role in the historical development, identity, or evolution of the associated entity.
-
B.
hasHistoricFeatures
Indicates that something possesses characteristics, elements, or attributes of historical significance.
-
C.
hasHistoryPeriod
Indicates that something is associated with, belongs to, or occurs within a specific historical period or era.
-
D.
hasHistoricMP
Indicates that an entity is or has been represented by a specific Member of Parliament at some point in the past.
-
E.
hasHistoricalProcess
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or characterized by, a historical process or sequence of events that unfolded over time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c9d3d48190a29ee491e1696a0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5278bacd88190a50dedfa59b622fc |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d5190a6dfc819088262957551808a1 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:40 p.m.