Triple

T1058876
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath E22858 entity
Predicate Neale HanveyTermStart P24339 FINISHED
Object 2019 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2019 | Statement: [Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, Neale HanveyTermStart, 2019]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: Neale HanveyTermStart
Context triple: [Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, Neale HanveyTermStart, 2019]
  • A. notableOfficeHolder
    Indicates that an entity is a significant or distinguished holder of a particular office or position associated with another entity.
  • B. lastIncumbent
    Indicates that the subject is the most recent person or entity to have held a particular position, office, or role before the current one.
  • C. currentSpeakerAssumedOffice
    Indicates that the person who is currently serving as speaker has taken up or begun holding a particular office or position.
  • D. notableFormerLeader
    Indicates that the subject was once a leader of the object and is recognized as particularly significant or prominent in that former leadership role.
  • E. formerDirector
    Indicates that one entity previously held the position of director of the other entity but no longer does.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493dada0481909c43649f9843ea91 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ba6e35ac8190802341c31bda0e3b completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b7340a048190807363f19d17a58f completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ba6d44c08190bf0ab28661ed8ca0 completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.