Triple
T10588754
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The White Lotus |
E249925
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterRenewedAs |
P94796
|
FINISHED |
| Object | anthology series |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: anthology series | Statement: [The White Lotus, laterRenewedAs, anthology series]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterRenewedAs Context triple: [The White Lotus, laterRenewedAs, anthology series]
-
A.
laterRenewedFor
Indicates that an existing agreement, contract, or arrangement was renewed again at a subsequent, later time.
-
B.
renewalDate
Indicates the date on which an existing agreement, subscription, or arrangement is scheduled to be renewed or extended.
-
C.
renewalStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of a renewal process for an existing agreement, subscription, or status.
-
D.
renewalTerm
Indicates the length or conditions of time for which an agreement, contract, or subscription is extended beyond its initial term.
-
E.
reaffirmedOn
Indicates that a prior decision, statement, or agreement was confirmed or validated again on a specific date or occasion.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c9d3d48190a29ee491e1696a0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d527793c588190bfe3a5261eb7f919 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d51907b2b881908ab9a8594688ee06 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d5270eca0481908573b698390c5b08 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:40 p.m.