Triple
T10587599
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Luis Colón de Toledo |
E249893
|
entity |
| Predicate | heldClaim |
P73422
|
FINISHED |
| Object | hereditary rights of Christopher Columbus in the Indies |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hereditary rights of Christopher Columbus in the Indies | Statement: [Luis Colón de Toledo, heldClaim, hereditary rights of Christopher Columbus in the Indies]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heldClaim Context triple: [Luis Colón de Toledo, heldClaim, hereditary rights of Christopher Columbus in the Indies]
-
A.
hasClaimOn
chosen
Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
-
B.
heldThat
Indicates that an entity (often a person or authority) maintained, asserted, or concluded that a particular proposition or judgment is true.
-
C.
held
Indicates that one entity physically grasped, carried, or kept another entity in its possession or control.
-
D.
heldAs
Indicates that one entity is kept, maintained, or regarded in a particular state, role, or condition by another entity.
-
E.
claimed
Indicates that an entity has asserted or stated something as true, often without definitive proof or verification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c9d3d48190a29ee491e1696a0e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5276b0ae48190b2935230363239e0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d51907b2b881908ab9a8594688ee06 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:40 p.m.