Triple

T1057625
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Norwegian ministries E22831 entity
Predicate accountableThrough P24325 FINISHED
Object parliamentary scrutiny LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: parliamentary scrutiny | Statement: [Norwegian ministries, accountableThrough, parliamentary scrutiny]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: accountableThrough
Context triple: [Norwegian ministries, accountableThrough, parliamentary scrutiny]
  • A. responsibleFor
    Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
  • B. assignedUnder
    Indicates that one entity has been given responsibility, duty, or authority to act within the scope, supervision, or framework defined by another entity.
  • C. actsOnBehalfOf
    Indicates that one entity performs actions or makes decisions as a representative or proxy for another entity.
  • D. assignedTo
    Indicates that responsibility for a task, item, or role has been designated to a specific entity.
  • E. cabinetResponsibleTo
    Indicates that a cabinet is politically accountable to, and can be held responsible by, a particular authority or body.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493dada0481909c43649f9843ea91 completed March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4ba6e35ac8190802341c31bda0e3b completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4b7340a048190807363f19d17a58f completed March 1, 2026, 10:01 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4ba6d44c08190bf0ab28661ed8ca0 completed March 1, 2026, 10:15 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:42 p.m.