Triple
T10576083
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Angas |
E249614
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sūtrakṛtāṅga |
E673820
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sūtrakṛtāṅga | Statement: [Angas, hasPart, Sūtrakṛtāṅga]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sūtrakṛtāṅga Context triple: [Angas, hasPart, Sūtrakṛtāṅga]
-
A.
Sutikshna
Sutikshna is a sage in the Aranya Kanda of the Ramayana, known for offering hospitality and guidance to Rama, Sita, and Lakshmana during their exile in the forest.
-
B.
Sutrakritanga
chosen
Sutrakritanga is a principal Jain canonical scripture that expounds on monastic conduct, philosophical doctrines, and the refutation of rival religious views.
-
C.
Ṭupṭīkā
Ṭupṭīkā is a foundational Mīmāṃsā commentary traditionally attributed to the philosopher Kumārila Bhaṭṭa, elaborating and defending Vedic ritual exegesis.
-
D.
Bhṛguvallī
Bhṛguvallī is a section of the Taittirīya Upanishad that presents the sage Bhrigu’s inquiry into the nature of Brahman through successive realizations of the self.
-
E.
Śaunaka
Śaunaka is an ancient Vedic sage traditionally regarded as an authority on ritual, lineage, and early Hindu sacred lore.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c8bd708190acf3d275c908251e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d5274b100c8190b477ef4cb745c269 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69d94b65313481909328bd9f7f39bf53 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:38 p.m.