Triple
T10564075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPA III |
E249301
|
entity |
| Predicate | programmingApproach |
P76294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | thematic priorities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: thematic priorities | Statement: [IPA III, programmingApproach, thematic priorities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: programmingApproach Context triple: [IPA III, programmingApproach, thematic priorities]
-
A.
programmingMethod
chosen
Indicates the method, technique, or approach used to carry out a programming-related activity or task.
-
B.
programming
Indicates that an entity writes, develops, or modifies software or code, typically using a programming language to create or control computer programs.
-
C.
developmentMethod
Indicates the process, technique, or approach used to create, build, or evolve something.
-
D.
programmingFocus
Indicates a relationship where an entity’s primary attention, effort, or specialization is directed toward a particular area or aspect of programming.
-
E.
programmingStyle
Indicates the particular approach, methodology, or paradigm an entity uses when writing or organizing code.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c8bd708190acf3d275c908251e |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d527224b808190b996ae970393f9c3 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d51901ff6c819095e7b528170a69dc |
completed | April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.