Triple

T10554273
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NSH E249034 entity
Predicate usesInStandingsTables P94650 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [NSH, usesInStandingsTables, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesInStandingsTables
Context triple: [NSH, usesInStandingsTables, yes]
  • A. hasStandings
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a set of rankings, positions, or status levels within a competitive or comparative context.
  • B. usesRegularSeasonStandingsFor
    Indicates that one entity determines outcomes or decisions based on the regular season standings of another entity.
  • C. usedInTournamentTables
    Indicates that something (such as a rule, format, or data structure) is employed within the context of tournament tables.
  • D. standingsCriteria
    Indicates the rules or factors used to determine the relative ranking or position of entities in a standings or leaderboard.
  • E. usesMedalTable
    Indicates that one entity presents or organizes information using a medal table format to summarize outcomes such as rankings or awards.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c733c08190ab1dd6239f5f34ae completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d527118da081909ca61bc555a17609 completed April 7, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d518fa0b4081909bffc936d78bd77b completed April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d5270eca0481908573b698390c5b08 completed April 7, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:34 p.m.