Triple

T10546572
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ruth Asawa Estate E248832 entity
Predicate ethnicHeritageFocus P51397 FINISHED
Object Japanese American artists LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese American artists | Statement: [Ruth Asawa Estate, ethnicHeritageFocus, Japanese American artists]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnicHeritageFocus
Context triple: [Ruth Asawa Estate, ethnicHeritageFocus, Japanese American artists]
  • A. ethnicOrigin
    Indicates the relationship where an entity is associated with a particular ethnic group or ancestry.
  • B. sharesEthnicity
    Indicates that two entities belong to the same ethnic group or share the same ethnic background.
  • C. ethnicAspect chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity reflects, involves, or characterizes the ethnic background, identity, or attributes of another entity.
  • D. holderEthnicity
    Indicates the ethnic background or group to which the holder of something (e.g., a document, account, or item) belongs.
  • E. ethnicCommunityContext
    Indicates the cultural, social, or historical context related to an entity’s association with a particular ethnic community.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d381c733c08190ab1dd6239f5f34ae completed April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d52710869c81909b6db1a190825bad completed April 7, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d518fa0b4081909bffc936d78bd77b completed April 7, 2026, 2:47 p.m.
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:33 p.m.