Triple
T10531120
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pazyryk culture |
E248441
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservationCause |
P94400
|
FINISHED |
| Object | water infiltration followed by freezing |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: water infiltration followed by freezing | Statement: [Pazyryk culture, preservationCause, water infiltration followed by freezing]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservationCause Context triple: [Pazyryk culture, preservationCause, water infiltration followed by freezing]
-
A.
reasonForPreservation
Indicates that something is being preserved or maintained for a particular reason, purpose, or justification.
-
B.
preservationPurpose
Indicates that something exists, is created, or is maintained with the specific aim of preserving or safeguarding another entity or resource.
-
C.
preservationType
Indicates the method or process by which something is preserved or kept from deterioration.
-
D.
preservationMethod
Indicates the technique or process used to maintain, protect, or prolong the condition, quality, or usability of something over time.
-
E.
preservationFactor
Indicates the degree to which something is protected, maintained, or kept intact over time, often moderating how much change, loss, or degradation occurs.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d381c5c7448190bec34bee7ec72bac |
completed | April 6, 2026, 9:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d50a16915c8190ac4f3fd5e43c5fed |
completed | April 7, 2026, 1:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d4fb9729288190a0149f127acd7ae3 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:41 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d4fe06d4a48190b1a45dd1d4e16df0 |
completed | April 7, 2026, 12:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 6, 2026, 12:30 p.m.