Triple
T105311
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eastern State Penitentiary |
E2125
|
entity |
| Predicate | penalPhilosophy |
P3051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solitary confinement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solitary confinement | Statement: [Eastern State Penitentiary, penalPhilosophy, solitary confinement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: penalPhilosophy Context triple: [Eastern State Penitentiary, penalPhilosophy, solitary confinement]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
chosen
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
philosophicalTradition
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is characterized by a particular philosophical school, movement, or line of thought.
-
C.
punishedBy
Indicates that an entity receives punishment administered by another entity.
-
D.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
-
E.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a24e0a5b7c81908d52da08c60dabc4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25711f6788190a22252ea3a3af394 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2563be81c81908ccc5ed44edd6b8e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:12 a.m.